SaasOpportunities Logo
SaasOpportunities

Where the Best SaaS Ideas Come From: 7 Unexpected Sources

S
SaasOpportunities Team||17 min read

Where the Best SaaS Ideas Come From: 7 Unexpected Sources

Most founders look for SaaS ideas in the obvious places: competitor analysis, market research reports, and brainstorming sessions. But the most profitable ideas rarely come from these conventional sources.

After analyzing hundreds of successful micro-SaaS products and interviewing dozens of founders who've reached $10K+ MRR, a clear pattern emerges: the best ideas come from unexpected places that most people overlook entirely.

This guide reveals seven unconventional sources where successful founders consistently discover validated, profitable SaaS opportunities—complete with real examples and actionable methods you can use today.

Why Conventional Idea Sources Fall Short

Before diving into where great ideas actually come from, let's address why traditional methods often fail.

Market research reports tell you about problems everyone already knows about. By the time a pain point makes it into a Gartner report, dozens of well-funded startups are already building solutions. Competitor analysis leads to me-too products that compete on features rather than unique insight.

The founders who build genuinely differentiated products tap into information sources that reveal problems before they become obvious to everyone else. They find friction points that people complain about in private but haven't yet articulated as clear market needs.

As we discussed in SaaS Ideas vs Execution: Why Your Idea Matters Less Than You Think, execution matters enormously. But starting with a unique insight gives you a significant advantage.

Source #1: Industry-Specific Podcasts and Conference Talks

While many founders mine YouTube comments for product opportunities, few pay attention to the gold mine hiding in niche industry podcasts and conference presentations.

Why This Works

Industry experts speak candidly about operational challenges on podcasts in ways they never would in formal settings. They discuss workarounds, manual processes, and frustrations that haven't been formalized into RFPs or feature requests yet.

Conference talks reveal what cutting-edge practitioners are struggling with right now—problems that will become mainstream pain points in 6-12 months.

Real Example

One founder discovered that DevOps engineers were manually tracking deployment frequencies across multiple tools by listening to a podcast where a Google engineer casually mentioned spending "an embarrassing amount of time in spreadsheets" despite having access to world-class tooling.

That throwaway comment led to a deployment analytics SaaS that reached $15K MRR within eight months by solving a problem most people didn't even know existed yet.

How to Mine This Source

Step 1: Identify 10-15 industry-specific podcasts in sectors with budget (FinTech, HealthTech, Enterprise SaaS, etc.)

Step 2: Listen at 2x speed for phrases like:

  • "We're still doing this manually"
  • "There's probably a better way to..."
  • "I wish someone would build..."
  • "We cobbled together a solution using..."

Step 3: Create a spreadsheet tracking:

  • Problem mentioned
  • Industry/role
  • Current workaround
  • Frequency of mention across sources

Step 4: When you hear the same problem mentioned in 3+ different podcasts, you've found a validated pain point worth investigating.

Conference recordings on YouTube are equally valuable. Search for phrases like "our workflow looks like this" or "here's how we currently handle" in transcripts—these sections reveal real operational processes and their pain points.

Source #2: LinkedIn Job Descriptions and Hiring Threads

While we've covered mining job postings for product gaps, there's a specific subset that's even more valuable: job descriptions that reveal broken processes.

Why This Works

When companies hire for roles that exist solely to manage manual processes or act as "human middleware" between systems, they're advertising a problem that software should solve.

Job descriptions are brutally honest about operational reality because they need to attract qualified candidates. Companies will admit to process problems in JDs that they'd never mention publicly.

Real Example

A founder noticed multiple SaaS companies hiring "Revenue Operations Coordinators" whose primary responsibility was "manually reconciling data between Stripe, Salesforce, and our data warehouse."

This pattern revealed that despite having best-in-class tools, companies still needed humans to move data between systems. He built a specialized integration tool that automated this specific workflow and sold it to 40+ customers within the first year.

How to Mine This Source

Step 1: Search LinkedIn Jobs for phrases like:

  • "Manual data entry"
  • "Reconcile between systems"
  • "Coordinate across platforms"
  • "Copy information from X to Y"

Step 2: Filter by company size (50-500 employees) and funding stage (Series A-C). These companies have budget but haven't yet built custom internal tools.

Step 3: Look for patterns across multiple job postings. If 10+ companies are hiring for the same manual process, there's a SaaS opportunity.

Step 4: Read the "Day in the Life" or "Responsibilities" sections carefully. These reveal the actual workflow, not just the problem.

Bonus: LinkedIn threads where hiring managers complain about hard-to-fill roles often reveal that they're hiring for a problem that shouldn't require a human at all.

Source #3: Changelog and Release Notes from Adjacent Tools

This might be the most overlooked source on this list. While we've discussed mining changelog files for opportunities, the real gold is in what changes reveal about user behavior.

Why This Works

Product teams prioritize features based on user demand. When a major SaaS tool adds a new feature, they're responding to thousands of customer requests. But new features often create new problems or reveal adjacent needs.

When Stripe adds a new billing feature, they're telling you what their customers are trying to do. When Salesforce deprecates functionality, they're creating a gap that needs filling.

Real Example

When Zapier announced they were sunsetting certain legacy integrations, one founder recognized that hundreds of businesses would need to rebuild workflows. He created a specialized migration tool specifically for moving automations from deprecated Zapier integrations to modern alternatives.

The tool was needed for only 6-8 months, but he charged $500-2000 per migration and generated $180K in revenue from a temporary problem.

How to Mine This Source

Step 1: Subscribe to changelog feeds from 20-30 major SaaS tools in your areas of interest.

Step 2: Look for:

  • New features that seem complicated (suggesting users are doing complex things)
  • Deprecated features (creating gaps)
  • Beta features (revealing future needs)
  • "Based on customer feedback" additions (validated demand)

Step 3: Ask: "What problem does this new feature create?" or "What adjacent need does this reveal?"

Step 4: Search Twitter/X and Reddit for reactions to major changes. User complaints about new features often reveal opportunities.

For example, when Notion added their API, the changelog revealed that thousands of users wanted to integrate Notion with other tools—creating opportunities for specialized integration tools, backup solutions, and workflow automation products.

Source #4: Private Community Onboarding Questions

Public forums like Reddit and Quora are valuable sources we've covered extensively. But private Slack communities, Discord servers, and membership forums contain even better insights—specifically in their onboarding and welcome channels.

Why This Works

When someone joins a professional community, they're usually in transition: new job, new role, new challenge. The questions they ask in the first week reveal gaps in their toolkit and knowledge.

These questions are asked before people know the "accepted" solutions, so they describe problems in raw, unsolved terms rather than asking for specific tools.

Real Example

In a private community for fractional CFOs, new members consistently asked: "How do you all handle financial reporting for multiple clients? I'm currently using separate Excel files and it's a nightmare."

One member built a specialized financial reporting tool designed specifically for fractional CFOs managing multiple clients. It reached $8K MRR within six months by solving a problem that was obvious within the community but invisible outside it.

How to Mine This Source

Step 1: Join 10-15 paid communities or professional Slack/Discord groups in industries with budget.

Step 2: Set up notifications for onboarding channels like #introductions, #welcome, or #getting-started.

Step 3: Track first-week questions that reveal operational challenges:

  • "What tools does everyone use for..."
  • "How do you handle..."
  • "Is there a better way to..."
  • "What's your workflow for..."

Step 4: When you see the same question asked by 5+ new members over a few months, you've found a systematic problem worth solving.

The key insight: people who just joined haven't yet adopted the community's workarounds. Their questions reveal the problem in its purest form.

This approach complements what we covered in mining Slack communities for opportunities, but focuses specifically on the onboarding experience.

Source #5: Software Migration Discussions and Switching Stories

When someone switches from one tool to another, they're not just changing software—they're revealing what mattered enough to justify the switching cost.

Why This Works

Switching costs are high. People only migrate when they're experiencing significant pain. The reasons they give for switching reveal validated problems that existing solutions aren't addressing.

Migration discussions also reveal what features people actually use versus what vendors think they want. The features people insist on having in their new tool are the ones that truly matter.

Real Example

A developer noticed that teams switching from Jira to Linear consistently mentioned that "Jira was too slow" and "we just wanted something fast." But digging deeper into migration threads, the real issue wasn't speed—it was that Jira's complexity made simple tasks take too long.

He built a simplified project management tool specifically for small engineering teams who found Jira overwhelming but didn't need Linear's full feature set. By positioning as "project management for teams who don't want project management," he reached $12K MRR in 14 months.

How to Mine This Source

Step 1: Search Twitter, Reddit, and indie hacker forums for phrases like:

  • "We switched from X to Y"
  • "Migrating from X to Y"
  • "Why we left X for Y"
  • "X vs Y: we chose Y because"

Step 2: Create a spreadsheet tracking:

  • Tool they left
  • Tool they chose
  • Stated reason for switching
  • Features they couldn't live without
  • Features they didn't need

Step 3: Look for patterns. When 20+ teams switch for the same reason, there's a gap.

Step 4: Identify the "unbundling opportunity"—the core feature people actually need without the bloat.

This connects directly to our analysis of expensive SaaS unbundling opportunities. Migration stories tell you exactly which features justify unbundling.

Source #6: Customer Success Team Escalations and Workarounds

If you currently work at a SaaS company, your customer success team is sitting on a gold mine of product ideas—specifically, the workarounds they teach customers and the escalations they handle repeatedly.

Why This Works

Customer success teams spend their days helping users accomplish things the product wasn't designed to do. Every workaround they teach represents a feature gap. Every repeated escalation represents a systematic problem.

These teams develop institutional knowledge about what customers are actually trying to accomplish versus what the product enables. That gap is where new products hide.

Real Example

A customer success manager at a major email marketing platform noticed she was teaching the same workaround dozens of times per week: how to manually segment subscribers based on purchase behavior from Shopify.

The platform didn't integrate deeply enough with Shopify to do this automatically, so she'd written a detailed guide explaining how to export data, manipulate it in Excel, and re-import it.

She built a specialized Shopify-to-email-platform integration tool that automated this specific workflow. It now generates $22K MRR serving customers of that email platform and several competitors.

How to Mine This Source

Step 1: If you work in SaaS, ask your CS team:

  • "What workarounds do you teach most often?"
  • "What feature requests do you hear every week?"
  • "What do customers try to do that our product can't handle?"
  • "What integration or export do people ask for constantly?"

Step 2: If you don't work in SaaS, interview CS professionals from your target industry:

  • Offer to buy them coffee or send a gift card
  • Ask about their most common support tickets
  • Request examples of creative workarounds

Step 3: Look for workarounds that:

  • Require manual steps (automation opportunity)
  • Involve multiple tools (integration opportunity)
  • Are documented in help articles (validated, repeated need)
  • Take more than 10 minutes to execute (worth paying to solve)

Step 4: Build the tool that eliminates the workaround entirely.

This source is particularly powerful because you're solving problems that existing vendors have implicitly validated (by having thousands of customers) but chosen not to solve (creating the gap).

Our guide on mining customer support tickets goes deeper into this methodology.

Source #7: "How I Do It" Content from Practitioners

Blog posts, Twitter threads, and YouTube videos where practitioners explain their actual workflows are underutilized idea sources. Not tutorial content, but behind-the-scenes looks at how professionals actually work.

Why This Works

When an expert explains their workflow, they're showing you their stack of tools, manual processes, and custom scripts. Every manual step is a potential product. Every "I built this custom script" is a SaaS opportunity.

Practitioners share these workflows to help others, but they're inadvertently revealing market gaps. If a successful professional has to cobble together a solution from five tools and two custom scripts, there's room for a purpose-built product.

Real Example

A founder found a blog post titled "How I Manage 40 Freelance Clients as a Solo Designer" that detailed a complex workflow involving Notion, Google Calendar, Stripe, and several custom Zapier automations.

The designer had built an impressive system, but it required 30+ minutes of manual updates each week. The founder built a specialized client management tool specifically for freelance designers that automated the entire workflow.

By targeting the specific use case (freelance designers, not all freelancers), he built exactly what that audience needed and reached $18K MRR in 18 months.

How to Mine This Source

Step 1: Search for content titled:

  • "How I [accomplish X]"
  • "My workflow for [specific task]"
  • "Behind the scenes: how I [do my job]"
  • "Tools I use to [achieve outcome]"

Step 2: Focus on successful practitioners (people with proven results), not influencers teaching courses.

Step 3: Diagram their workflow:

  • List every tool mentioned
  • Note every manual step
  • Identify every "I wish this existed"
  • Count how many tools they need for one outcome

Step 4: Look for patterns across multiple practitioners in the same field. If five successful professionals use similar Frankenstein workflows, there's an opportunity.

Step 5: Build the single tool that replaces their entire workflow.

The key is focusing on workflows from people who have already achieved success. Their processes are validated—they work—but they're inefficient. You're not validating whether the outcome is valuable (they've already proven it is), just whether you can deliver it more efficiently.

This approach aligns perfectly with solving your own problems, but extends it to solving problems that successful people have already worked around.

How to Systematically Exploit These Sources

Finding one good idea from these sources is valuable. Building a systematic process to consistently generate ideas is transformative.

Create Your Idea Discovery Routine

Monday (1 hour): Review 10 industry podcast episodes at 2x speed, noting any mentioned pain points.

Tuesday (1 hour): Scan 50-100 job postings in your target industries for manual process descriptions.

Wednesday (1 hour): Review changelog updates from 20 major SaaS tools, looking for new features and deprecations.

Thursday (1 hour): Monitor onboarding channels in your professional communities for first-week questions.

Friday (1 hour): Research migration discussions and "how I do it" content from practitioners.

This five-hour weekly routine, detailed in our weekly discovery routine guide, will generate more validated ideas than most founders find in months of brainstorming.

Build Your Idea Capture System

Create a simple spreadsheet with columns for:

  • Problem description
  • Source (which of the 7 sources)
  • Industry/role affected
  • Current workaround
  • Frequency (how often you've seen it mentioned)
  • Validation signals (number of people affected, willingness to pay indicators)
  • Next steps (research needed)

When an idea appears in your tracking sheet from 3+ different sources, it's worth serious investigation. This is the core principle behind our SaaS idea funnel.

Validate Before Building

Once you've identified a promising idea from these sources, don't immediately start building. Follow a structured validation process:

  1. Find 10 people experiencing the problem - If you can't find them easily, the market might be too small

  2. Understand their current solution - What they're doing now reveals what they'll pay for

  3. Quantify the pain - How much time/money does the problem cost them?

  4. Test willingness to pay - Would they pay for a solution? How much?

  5. Validate the approach - Show mockups or describe the solution to gauge interest

Our validation framework and validation checklist provide detailed processes for this stage.

Common Mistakes When Using These Sources

Even with access to these unconventional sources, founders make predictable mistakes:

Mistake #1: Collecting Without Analyzing

Saving podcast quotes and job descriptions feels productive, but doesn't create value. You need to analyze patterns, not just collect data points.

Set a rule: for every hour spent collecting ideas, spend 30 minutes analyzing patterns and validating demand.

Mistake #2: Building for Edge Cases

Just because one person has a problem doesn't mean it's a market. These sources reveal individual pain points—you need to find the pattern across multiple people before building.

Require at least 5-10 independent mentions of the same problem before considering it validated.

Mistake #3: Ignoring Market Size

These sources are excellent at revealing real problems, but they don't automatically tell you if enough people have the problem to build a business.

After identifying a problem, research market size. How many people have this role? How many companies fit the profile? Is the market growing or shrinking?

Mistake #4: Skipping Competitive Research

Just because you found a problem in an unconventional place doesn't mean no one else has built a solution. Always research existing solutions before assuming you've found a gap.

Sometimes the opportunity isn't building something new—it's building a better version of something that exists but doesn't serve a specific niche well.

Combining Sources for Maximum Insight

The real power comes from combining multiple sources to validate the same opportunity.

For example:

  • You hear a podcast where someone mentions a manual process
  • You find job postings hiring for that manual process
  • You see changelog updates that create new complexity around that process
  • You notice onboarding questions about handling that process
  • You find migration discussions where people mention the process as a pain point

When the same problem appears across 4-5 different sources, you've found something worth building. This triangulation approach dramatically increases your odds of success.

This multi-source validation is a key principle in our systematic research method.

Taking Action: Your Next Steps

You now know where successful founders find their best ideas. Here's how to put this knowledge into action:

This Week

  1. Choose two sources from this list that align with your expertise or interests
  2. Set up your tracking system - Create the spreadsheet with columns mentioned above
  3. Spend 2-3 hours mining those sources using the specific methods outlined
  4. Document 5-10 potential problems - Don't filter yet, just capture

This Month

  1. Establish your discovery routine - Block time weekly to mine these sources systematically
  2. Look for patterns - Which problems appear multiple times across sources?
  3. Start conversations - Reach out to 5-10 people who might have the problems you've identified
  4. Validate one idea - Take your most promising concept through initial validation

This Quarter

  1. Build a minimum viable product for your most validated idea
  2. Get your first 5-10 users from the communities where you found the problem
  3. Iterate based on feedback - These early users will tell you what matters
  4. Continue mining - Keep your discovery routine going to build your idea pipeline

The founders who consistently build successful products don't rely on lightning-strike inspiration. They systematically mine unconventional sources where real problems hide in plain sight.

Start with one source. Build your system. Find your idea.

Ready to discover more validated opportunities? Explore our collection of proven SaaS niches with real revenue data or dive into specific industry opportunities to find your next profitable product.

Share this article

Get notified of new posts

Subscribe to get our latest content by email.

Get notified when we publish new posts. Unsubscribe anytime.